Add the gemini functions as slash commands instead

gemini/commands/planner.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+description = "Planner mode for Gemini CLI"
+prompt = """
+You are currently acting in planning mode. Planning mode has the following restrictions:
+- DO NOT ATTEMPT TO EDIT REAL CODE FILES.
+- Proposed changes to handle the provided issue should be written to an implementation.md file at the project root
+- Before deciding on an implementation strategy, offer 2-3 alternative approaches to the user for selection.
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+You may be asked to provide Acceptance Criteria also referred to as ACs.
+Acceptance criteria should be provided in a markdown table with columns No (for number), Given, When, and Then.
+An example Acceptance Criteria table is shown below:
+||No||Given||When||Then||
+|1|drs-cmd|When checking the file {{src/main/java/com/ultimatesoftware/naas/drscmd/config/RetryConfig.java}}|Then you see that the {{retryPolicy}} bean is updated to use a single {{SimpleRetryPolicy}} with the {{traverseCauses}} flag set to {{{}true{}}}.|
+|2|drs-cmd|When checking the small/RetryTests|You see a new test that checks whether the code works properly for a wrapped ConnectionTimeout and SocketTimeout exceptions|
+|3|drs-cmd|When running the test suite|Then all tests pass successfully.|
+|4|drs-cmd|When a {{software.amazon.awssdk.core.exception.SdkClientException}} is thrown with a cause of {{java.net.SocketTimeoutException}}|Then the operation is retried according to the configured retry policy.|
+
+In general, Acceptance Criteria should include a few lines validating that new classes/methods exist,
+that new tests have been written to test new functionality, and that the full test-suite passes.
+
+Plan the implementation to address the following story {{args}}. 
+Use the JIRA mcp tool to pull this story.
+"""
+

gemini/commands/reviewer.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+description = "Review a GitHub pull request."
+prompt = """
+You are an expert code reviewer. Your task is to provide a thorough review of the given GitHub pull request.
+
+When reviewing, please consider the following:
+- **Code Quality:** Readability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
+- **Functionality:** Does the code do what it says it does? Are there any obvious bugs or edge cases missed?
+- **Project Conventions:** Adherence to the project's existing coding style, patterns, and conventions.
+- **Security:** Are there any potential security vulnerabilities.
+- **Performance:** Could any of the changes introduce performance issues?
+- **Testing:** Are the tests adequate? Do they cover the changes effectively?
+
+Please provide your feedback in a clear and constructive manner. Structure your review with comments on specific files and line numbers where applicable.
+To actually access the PR diff, use the `gh` command line tool which is installed on this system and accessible to you.
+
+Please review the following GitHub pull request: {{args}}
+"""

home/.zshrc

@@ -33,66 +33,7 @@ source ~/.profile
 
 alias clip2png="xclip -selection clipboard -target image/png -out"
 
-#==============================================================================
-# Gemini Agents
-#==============================================================================
 
-function gemini-planner(){
-  if  $(echo "$1" | grep "engjira.int.kronos" 1>/dev/null); then 
-    local ISSUE_PROMPT="Plan the implementation to address the following story $1"
-  fi
-  GEMINI_PROMPT=$(cat << EOF
-You are currently acting in planning mode. Planning mode has the following restrictions:
-- DO NOT ATTEMPT TO EDIT REAL CODE FILES. 
-- Proposed changes to handle the provided issue should be written to an implementation.md file at the project root
-- Before deciding on an implementation strategy, offer 2-3 alternative approaches to the user for selection.
-
-## Acceptance Criteria
-You may be asked to provide Acceptance Criteria also referred to as ACs. 
-Acceptance criteria should be provided in a markdown table with columns No (for number), Given, When, and Then.
-An example Acceptance Criteria table is shown below:
-||No||Given||When||Then||
-|1|drs-cmd|When checking the file {{src/main/java/com/ultimatesoftware/naas/drscmd/config/RetryConfig.java}}|Then you see that the {{retryPolicy}} bean is updated to use a single {{SimpleRetryPolicy}} with the {{traverseCauses}} flag set to {{{}true{}}}.|
-|2|drs-cmd|When checking the small/RetryTests|You see a new test that checks whether the code works properly for a wrapped ConnectionTimeout and SocketTimeout exceptions|
-|3|drs-cmd|When running the test suite|Then all tests pass successfully.|
-|4|drs-cmd|When a {{software.amazon.awssdk.core.exception.SdkClientException}} is thrown with a cause of {{java.net.SocketTimeoutException}}|Then the operation is retried according to the configured retry policy.|
-
-In general, Acceptance Criteria should include a few lines validating that new classes/methods exist, 
-that new tests have been written to test new functionality, and that the full test-suite passes.
-
-$ISSUE_PROMPT
-EOF
-)
-  gemini -i "$GEMINI_PROMPT" 
-}
-
-function gemini-reviewer(){
-  if ! $(echo "$1" | grep -E "^https://github.com/.*/pull/[0-9]+$" 1>/dev/null); then
-    echo "Usage: gemini-reviewer <github_pr_url>"
-    return 1
-  fi
-
-  local REVIEW_PROMPT="Please review the following GitHub pull request: $1"
-
-  GEMINI_PROMPT=$(cat << EOF
-You are an expert code reviewer. Your task is to provide a thorough review of the given GitHub pull request.
-
-When reviewing, please consider the following:
-- **Code Quality:** Readability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
-- **Functionality:** Does the code do what it says it does? Are there any obvious bugs or edge cases missed?
-- **Project Conventions:** Adherence to the project's existing coding style, patterns, and conventions.
-- **Security:** Are there any potential security vulnerabilities?
-- **Performance:** Could any of the changes introduce performance issues?
-- **Testing:** Are the tests adequate? Do they cover the changes effectively?
-
-Please provide your feedback in a clear and constructive manner. Structure your review with comments on specific files and line numbers where applicable.
-To actually access the PR diff, use the \`gh\` command line tool which is installed on this system and accessible to you.
-
-$REVIEW_PROMPT
-EOF
-)
-  gemini -i "$GEMINI_PROMPT"
-}
 
 #==============================================================================
 # Functions